I read a piece
yesterday that got me thinking and I’ll share it with you now:
“We’ve bought into
the idea that education is about training and “success”, defined monetarily,
rather than learning to think critically and to challenge. We should not forget
that the true purpose of education is to make minds, not careers. A culture
that does not grasp the vital interplay between morality and power, which
mistakes management techniques for wisdom, which fails to understand that the
measure of a civilization is its compassion, not its speed or ability consume,
condemns itself to death.” – Chris Hedges, Pulitzer Winning Journalist
I really appreciate
the sentiment in that statement. I’ve always been an advocate of learning for
the sake of learning and the broadening of horizons. While waiting for the
train this morning I saw a glimpse of this business/success motivated child
rearing. A few of my fellow commuters
had their children with them and I can only guess that it was some sort of
bring your offspring to work day thing. It got me thinking about the
motivations behind the whole, “Bring your Children to Work Day”.
I suddenly found it
hard to believe that a large corporation was interested in the family bond
between parents and children yet they encouraged a day to show your children
what it is you do for a living. Was it really for the structure of the family
unit or, now I might be off on this, could it be that they wanted to provide
your children with a model or example of how to be a good little worker bee
when they grow up?
I remember the
whole lecture from teachers, “How can you get a good job without this (certain
level) of education? Don’t you want to be successful?” It’s a terrible thought
now. Considering I want very little to do with the business world I’m currently
embroiled in. I had no business aspirations as a young man. I always thought of
myself as an artistic guy, unencumbered by the trappings of business. However,
here I am. 35 years old in a cubicle in a big downtown office building, pushing
paper and using terms like, “deposition testimony”, and, “economic loss claim”.
I’d hate, if I had
a child, to put them through something like that. “See Grace (my imaginary
daughter’s name is Grace), this is what Daddy does to pay for things. He hates
every day of it and one day when you grow up, you can be a wage slave too. Isn’t
that fun?”
I’d never take
Grace to work with me but rather let her explore the world with wide, optimistic
eyes and maybe she’ll grow up challenging the norms of society and become an
iconoclast to be revered and remembered. I’d hope that by the time she’s in
imaginary awesome school the teachers will be focused on giving her the
practical skills to survive but are not molding her into another punch-clock
drone. I certainly will do my part to keep her as far away from a cubicle of
her own as any imaginary father would.
I’ve said it before;
I’m not a fan of formalized education. I am a fan of a structured education. I’m
not an educational anarchist. I do believe that a child needs structure and
rules but not ones that steer a child toward a career that focuses on the accumulation
of wealth over an accumulation of knowledge.
No comments:
Post a Comment